|
An Example of
Why PBH needs Unified Effective Covenants
This example
should illustrate why PBH needs new Unified Effective Covenants.
Example:
North Cedar Brook partially-built House
In 2006, a
Lot owner at 1204 North Cedar Brook Rd started building a house
o 3+
years later, house is still unfinished
o
Construction debris spread everywhere (until unknown locals picked it up)
o
Neighbors have difficulty selling their houses due to the unsightly
situation
o
Severe impact to their/our PBH property values
o
Boulder County Government won’t help
Quote from
Boulder County Commissioners’ letter dated 12/29/2009 to PBH about this
problem:
“While
we are sympathetic to the residents, as the site is an eye sore, Boulder
County does
not have a
land use code that can aid the HOA in resolving your issue of violation of
your
HOA
covenants.
Differences
between how old, established 1960s/1992 Covenants
treat this
problem vs proposed new revised Covenants
|
|
“Old”
established Covenants |
“New”
revised Covenants |
|
Unified
Covenants across all PBH Units
à |
No |
Yes |
|
Effective
Enforcement
à |
74 Lot
Owners in PBH unit 4 only |
~430 Lot
Owners across all PBH units + PBH HOA representing Lot Owners |
|
What Kind
of Enforcement
à |
Lawsuit
only – Very Expensive ! |
Arbitration – Much Less Expensive |
Don't
you all want the combined strength of all of Pine Brook Hills
to help
resolve problems like this ?
Just ask any
of the many North Cedar Brook petitioners mentioned below –
they will
tell you a resounding "yes" we want the help !
Backup
reference information about this situation is attached:
|
